NOVEMBER 2019

Reactions to last month's article
"This Changes Everything"
by Rod Heckelman

THIS ISSUE
Publisher's Notes - Letters - Facility of the Month - Organization of the Month - Male Pro of the Month
Female Pro of the Month - Spotlight Pickleball - Suzanna McGee Fitness - Marsha Friedman PR
Trending - Rod Heckelman - Javier Palenque - Roger Stenquist - Rich Neher Feature - Gary Horvath
Chris Hagman - Joshua Jacobs - Where Are They Now?

abc

 

 


Rich,

Thanks for all you do for all of us in the tennis industry. I want to comment on the article regarding the changing of tennis pros to employee status. I couldn't disagree more about the article and interpretation of the new law. Please see my comments below. You are also given permission to share my comments with your readers.

The gist of the article centers around these "new" rules and regulations:

Under the bill's codified ABC test, a worker is an employee rather than an independent contractor unless the hiring entity demonstrates the following conditions:

1. (A) The person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact.
Think about it! Here at Palisades Tennis Club, we have four tennis pros who conduct their own business at our facility. In our community and elsewhere (and probably your facility) tennis teachers are referred to as "He/she is a teacher
AT Palisades TC" (Not FOR PTC). Personally, I could care less if any of the tennis pros are here or not. ?We do not set their schedule, we do not tell them what they can or cannot charge for their services (Incidentally, all of the tennis pros who rent space from us to operate their business each charge different fees). None of these tennis pros participate in ANY CLUB FUNCTION AT MY BUSINESS. They do not participate in the formation or organization of any activities, tournaments or any other events. They rent the space to perform their business, give a lesson and leave. Every single one of these individuals is always asking for more court usage, which is rarely given in that our priority is that of our members and their access to court time. Most of the tennis pro clients are non-members of my club.

The tennis pros at my facility do one thing:
THEY PAY RENT TO THE FACILITY.

2. (B) The person performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business.
Again, think about it! People who rent space from our facility have
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH OUR BUSINESS OR ITS OPERATION. Our facility and EVERY tennis facility's ONLY business operation is providing ACCESS to our facilities to members who pay a monthly fee for that privilege?-nothing more, nothing less! We are not in the business of teaching tennis. We are in the business of providing access to a facility to PLAY the sport, use its other amenities such as cocktail lounge, restaurant, Jacuzzi, etc. We are not in business to teach someone how to play the game. That is done by people who are in THAT business, not our business.

3. (C) The person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.

In a nutshell that is it. They have their business. I have my business. They are two totally separate and different businesses.

Ken Stuart, Owner
Palisades Tennis Club
Newport Beach, California


 


Rich,

The article by Rod regarding IC tennis professionals is a big one that will affect clubs and resorts when they are looking for tennis professionals. It would be especially challenging for smaller clubs that only have programs in the summer who contract out their tennis program to one professional.

There are also a number of tennis management firms that contract with clubs and resorts to supply tennis professionals thus taking the burden of employment from the site. A large number of these management firms use IC professionals to fill those jobs. Some of these companies operate in one city or in neighboring cities so they would be affected. Larger companies would not be as their professionals are all employees but there may be some that don't follow that formula due to the cost of doing business.

It will be interesting to see how it plays out. As you said, it all comes down to enforcement and perhaps people turning other people or companies in.

Anonymous