OCTOBER 2019

Publisher's Notes - FEATURE 1 Rod Heckelman - FEATURE 2 Delaine Mast - FEATURE 3 Rich Neher WO19 - LETTERS
Facility Award - Organization Award - Male Pro Award - Female Pro Award - Pickleball - Suzanna McGee Fitness
Gary Horvath League Participation - Marsha Friedman - Ed Shanaphy - Gary Horvath Player Development

 

abc

 

 

 

USTA Player Development

We had asked our readers 3 questions:

1. What do you think of the USTA Player Development Program? Thumbs up or down?

2. If you think the USTA should continue pumping hundreds of millions into PD, tell us why.

3. Do you agree that the USTA Board should vote to discontinue PD immediately and put the millions saved into grassroots tennis?


 

1) Not sure what that program entails but it seems to me Thumbs down.
2) I think NO. People often push their children into programs like this hoping to earn scholarship money through tennis for them. The kids don't ever get to simply enjoy sport.
3)Not sure it should be discontinued but certainly it should not be funded with millions.

So exactly who are these players and who is actually getting funded?

Aleece Schwalenberg

 

No
No
Zero

Ron Young


 

1. Down
2. No
3. Yes

Andy Webb


 

At one of the hall of fame dinners I spoke with several coaches who felt that the money should be directed to local pros who work with kids who live in each smaller town rather than the big tennis centers where while families have to pick up and relocate in order for their kids to play.

It would seem healthier for kids, tennis, and the country as a whole to focus on tennis being a family sport, a neighborhood sport, a lifetime sport, etc. rather than just try to produce a national champion.

Fun, family, and exercise seem more important than producing that one great star. So many good players have come from local programs. I think the USTA should support those "starter" pros in the trenches. It is much easier to polish a player with good fundamentals than it is to give a beginner good fundamentals. But, often those starter pros are overlooked.

I remember the fun I had in central Illinois playing the "circuit." Public parks had good programs and out of those programs we went on to Wimbledon. Tennis was a lifestyle, not a factory.

Alice Tym


 

1. Down
2. No
3. Yes

Andy Webb


 

1. Program needs modification. Foreign federations have development programs.

2. USTA needs to fund a development program to compete with foreign federations.

3. More money should be allocated to grassroots tennis.

Andrew G. Weiss


 

I'm not up to speed on the national USTA but there has been some activity in Pacific Northwest. The USTA leased two facilities in Vancouver WA and Tacoma WA to create more opportunities for junior tennis players. They hired pros, provide junior tennis instruction, drop-in classes and returned six courts to the Tacoma Washington Area. The Galbraith Tennis Center in Tacoma used to be operated by Bally's Fitness. Vancouver WA was managed by the City of Vancouver.

Local players are pleased with the additional courts, increase in drills classes, and opportunities for juniors. However, the USTA made some errors in the start-up. First, they hired all the pros from the locally owned clubs. The USTA could have brought in new experienced pros that would help to create a larger pool of tennis professionals. The USTA had the opportunity to create job opportunities for pros. Instead they "stole" pros from the other clubs. Smaller clubs had to scramble to fill the spots.

At the adult USTA competitive teams, rather then reach out and create more players, they merely recruit players from other clubs. If you try out a drop-in class, you may be asked to join a Galbraith team. If you are strong. That is acceptable and complementary, but new and weaker players are left without a team.

Overall, players are pleased with the additional courts but question the USTA motivation - are they focused on building new players, juniors and adults, or just pulling pros and players from the local clubs to make a name for themselves?

I play on Galbraith teams because I am a strong player at my level. I see several missed opportunities to build the sport.

Anonymous


 

I don't think asking readers a three question poll is the solution. Any focused effort is a step in that right direction. But, any organization that is going to deliver results needs to look at all options. The reality is just with great college sports programs championships results bringing in more dollars to schools, if the US breeds champions it is going to make young kids love the game and aspire to be a champion. It is the pursuit of greatness that makes champions in life. the majority of kids playing are not going to make it but they can learn valuable lessons for life.

In the past I paid more attention to things. The one thing that I notice is the development of the whole athlete or player is incomplete. When USTA coaches let players eat McDonalds it is an issue. The general public sees this they either question the programs or think eating that way is beneficial.

The one thing that never goes out of style is greatness.

I often play events with past champions who have owned greatness. I have never understood when there are so many past champions like myself from other countries in the US why their isn't a summit with these players sponsored by the USTA so they can develop the worlds greatest player development program. The US and foreign champions working together should be a priority. There are plenty of coaches who take players to certain levels but when trying to breed greatness it makes sense to seek guidance from those who have achieved it at the highest levels. Every level including the club level needs a budget to develop players. But, greatness is contagious.

My husband and I helped a girl, daughter of immigrants with not great means get her break in the game starting to work with her from the time she was fourteen sponsoring her coaching and other training. She became top seventy in the world. After she worked with us she worked with the USTA which happened for financial reasons. She never took a big financial risk to invest in a top team of coaches. The USTA never asked for our input or what we did to help her launch her career which had many levels of success and failures.

We also helped a young US player climb from 110 to 26 on the WTA tour in eight months. The USTA never asked how we accomplished this jump in rankings. She was also with the USTA prior to us simply for financial reasons.

My point is I can make a long grocery list of past players who don't do much if anything with the USTA or working with club pros to develop champions.

The only time this model was considered having multiple champions helping the then director of player development probably had too many drinks when they proposed it and forgot the conversation.

Martin and others have done great things but they are wasting their greatest resource in my eyes an army of past champions.

Three answers to three questions is a step in the right direction but not the answer. So I gave you my input beyond three questions.

Brenda Schultz


 

The best program we had was local area training centers ..
The best players from each area [100 in usa with 16 in Midwest ]
Each center had 10 boys and girls
USTA gave all the kids 1 , ONE COTTON T SHIRT and provided balls , each center
Funded the remaining expenses by charging a small fee for the 50 hours
Of training provided ...
Pat McEnroe cut the program because of the expense to USTA he thought
But wasn't sure ...
That is my problem where local areas got the best kids together to train
Like Caty +john McNally in Cincinnati area Center Rajiv ram in Indy
1000s of college players got their boost in ctc Or atc...
Player dev always has done the same thing taking care of the kids they
Have relationships with ...

Bryan Nibert


 

1. What do you think of the USTA Player Development Program? Thumbs up or down?
My son has been part of USTAPD since he was 5. First let me define "part of"; I have always taken the position that private coaching is better for my family because its something I can control, watch closely, and hold a coach accountable for. That can't be done with the USTAPD. I have taken the approach of having a private coach as a primary coach and weaving in the positive feedback of USTAPD coaches when and where appropriate. This is particularly important for the younger players…Why do I think this? First, early development of technique is critical. Before the age of 10 (and probably earlier for girls) the neurons are developed. I don't believe that any USTAPD coach has the early development experience necessary (to me, early development is up to age 12). Second, there needs to be a personal connection and chemistry between any coach and child; if its not fun, and there isn't trust, the kid will drop out. This is an art, and without a 1on1 relationship that is very difficult. I also believe that the USTAPD is more focused on short term results than development.; to me, thats a mistake and also not psychologically good for kids. Lastly, I believe that we make a critical mistake in the U.S. when it comes to developing kids in tennis. I think we have it backwards; what I see is the most inexperienced coaches working with the younger kids - its more like baby-sitting. The reality is that only the highly experience coaches have the eyes to be able to discern bio-mechanics, and they are the ones that have a better sense of what motivates a player. The great Rick Macci is a perfect example of a coach that does this very well. There is not a single coach within USTAPD that either knows how to work with younger kids or has that level of experience. Its very different working with young kids than an 18 year old. In Russia and other eastern Euro countries, the more experienced coaches work with the younger kids.
That being said, I believe that there are some very very strong coaches in USTAPD that have a ton of high-level high-performance experience for older players. But part of this should be looked at as what the definition of "Player Development" really is and what stage of player development we are talking about; to me the USTA does not really "develop" players. They refine players. That's where their expertise lies in my opinion given their coaching stable, and they have a lot of coaching voices to help players refine their game, particularly as they transition into the pro or college ranks.

2. If you think the USTA should continue pumping hundreds of millions into PD, tell us why.
Again, it depends on where the money goes and what the definition of Player Development is. I actually think that the USTA should put more money into developing the sport in the US, not less. I just think that it needs to be better and more smartly distributed. I am an advocate of funding the private sector and motivating the private sector coaches monetarily. Im also an advocate of funding travel and coaching expenses for players to support a more diverse competition schedule, and having a more 'professional team' around a player. I'm also an advocate of putting more money into junior tournaments, and lower level pro tournaments. To me, all this falls under the broad definition of "Player Development". While I understand that the USTAPD leadership may be harshly criticized by some, we all need to be cognizant of the inequitable playing opportunities globally that contribute to player development impacts. For example, Europe has way more ITF junior events, and way more ITF pro events than the US, and on a geographic and per capita basis its even worse. That provides a competitive advantage towards developing players in that region and why I would imagine we are seeing more player success for those areas.

3. Do you agree that the USTA Board should vote to discontinue PD immediately and put the millions saved into grassroots tennis?
No I don't agree with that statement/question for many reasons. First, putting that kind of money into grassroots tennis implies a certain marketing expertise that the USTA has not demonstrated that they have. The fact is that USTA junior membership has dropped every year for the last 12 years. I fully support putting money into growing the game and grassroots, but with goals and accountability and with a professional marketing entity involved.
I also don't agree that the USTAPD should be immediately discontinued for the reasons I cited above ;we need more playing opportunities, and we need more affordability - how can that happen without money and without an entity to manage it all. I believe that the USTA BOD should take a close look at expenditures and re-thinking how USTAPD is going about trying to improve player development in the US.

Cristpher Boyer


 

I am not so involved in junior to senior player development but we have pros and sites that are. What would be interesting is to see the P&L for PD and see where the money goes to and how far it trickles down. As with the USTA approach to communities asking for a grant to build courts it would be nice for coaches and communities to do grants for PD funds.

Clark Corey


 

1. THUMBS DOWN
2. HELL NO
3. Been stating that for over 30+ years!!! HELL YES!!!!

Dale Hartwig


 

1. Thumbs down.
2. USTA like the us government is wasting money. They should distribute the money to the Associations so development can again return to the days of Perry Jones and his system. Also all the coaches teach the same style. Why do we not copy Roger Federer's style. We need to go to the net much more and use finesse.
3. Yes, stop the PD programs, waste of money and time. We are never under the present system have a US man win a Grand Slam Championship.

Dale Jensen


 

Question 1 Thumbs down
Question 2 No don't pump millions in
Question 3 Discontinue

Dan Prasil


 

1. No
2. No
3. Yes

Danny Mattes


 

As a private coach who spent over 15 year coaching professional players I have an opinion. The usta has never produced players they usually try to take players from their private coaches when they have success. My example I coached Chuck Adams for over ten years. The usta continually tried to get Chuck to have the usta take over. Didn't happen. He continued to have 7 top ten win without the usta as did Sampras, Agassi, Martin, McEnroe, Palmer, Stark, Courier, Krickstein, Gilbert and the list goes on. There it is. I do like Martin Blackman and he will do great things.

David Harley Smith


 

1. Thumbs down
2. The USTA should stop putting this ungodly amount of money into player development and start helping local programs around the country. The SCTA is about to make the same mistake with Carson. They are taking back sectionals etc and this will hurt local facilities who currently run these events. All that money could be spent assisting local pros and community associations build tennis from the ground up.
3. Yes

Dennis Claus


 

1. Thumbs down.
2. I don't
3. Yes

Don Sigmon

 


 

THUMBS DOWN.

The USTA took player development away from the pros around 1990. For about 30 years the program has been filled with good intent.
How many players from their program have truly had an ongoing impact on the WTA and ATP tours?
Foreign players are attracted to college tennis in the U.S. because they see opportunity here. Foreign players come to the U.S. because we have good coaches and academies. The problem doesn't seem to be a shortage of quality instruction in the U.S.

USA Soccer, USA Volleyball, USA Hockey, USA Swimming have had greater success than USTA with smaller budgets? Even USA Gymnastics has had great success, outside the scandals. Why are their NGBs better at creating winners than USTA?

I think we need to ask the question, "What is the purpose of PD and what can we realistically expect a PD program to achieve?" The USTA should invest in player development at a more appropriate level, although a philosophical argument could be made that the USTA should not be investing in the careers of a few hand-picked "USTA HP coaches" whose goal is to advance the careers of a handful of players.

Please don't add any more USTA programs, we currently have too many. The industry needs to secure funding for the construction of non-USTA facilities and certified professionals to staff them. Grants and low-interest loans for the construction of these facilities would require them to have ongoing plans for grassroots tennis. It would be great for the USTA could be a major silent contributor to that fund, $50 to $100 million per year.

Anonymous


 

1. What do you think of the USTA Player Development Program? Thumbs up or down?- I believe it's shaky. Thumbs down.

2. If you think the USTA should continue pumping hundreds of millions into PD, tell us why. - Yes, having successful professional athletes in a sport promotes participation in that sport and it's growth within that country. Tennis needs to foster growth, therefore Player Development is vital and needs funding.

3. Do you agree that the USTA Board should vote to discontinue PD immediately and put the millions saved into grassroots tennis? - No, I don't agree. Perhaps some reallocation, but not abandoning PD entirely.

Gene Desrochers


 

1. Men's development thumbs down, womens- thumbs up.

2. Get rid of it- no. Streamline it - yes. Must find ways to improve it. How can Canada be so good now? More money should go to grass roots. USTA is already doing much better in its

Geoff Griffin


 

1. Thumbs down
2. NO! Its not going to the right places and they are wasting public $$$
3. Yes, I agree that PD should be discontinued and millions should be put to grass root programs.

Gordon Zawtun


 

1. Thumbs down, nobody has provided me tangible evidence that this is working. Pick one player? I can not.

2. Absolutely not. Why pay for something that does not work?

3. Yes, this sport is leaving the United States. Keeping it here involves a grass roots investment in order to bring the spark back, and open the sport up for all who want to try.

Grant Day


 

1. DOWN
2. We need to support top players play based on rankings but don't need 400 million to accomplish that task.
3. Disband and at least half to grassroots,

Anonymous


 

1. Thumbs down
2. No
3. Discontinue. Put the money into local courts; eliminate sanction fees for tournaments (especially junior) if entry fees are lowered, to make them more affordable; subsidize junior tournaments (perhaps by paying for officials would be one way) to make junior tennis more affordable; eliminate league entry fees - make it a free benefit of membership. I'm sure there are lots of better uses for the money and many ways to help grassroots tennis.

Jim Block


 

When the USTA (10-15 years ago) initiated the "National Coaches Program" and invested about 2 million per year for perhaps 4-5 years, it created a great deal of enmity between the USTA and individual coaches of competitive juniors, what to speak of the obvious redundancy.

At that time, I thought the money would be better spent by incentivizing success by the individual coaches by compensating them for getting the juniors in their program competing and ranked regionally and nationally, and the same if they competed in ITF junior events. The families could also get incentives with equipment, waived entry fees, or whatever. Of course, sportsmanship requirements, parent training, etc. should/would go hand-in-hand with a plan like that.

Joe Dinoffer


 

I was a high school and elementary school principal for 29 years. During this same time, I also owned and ran a tennis club.

At my tennis club, I had a bunch of what I call self-selected kids in my programs. Sometimes, I had a self-selected tennis student who went to college on a tennis scholarship, but that was maybe one or two kids every 4 or 5 years. I had a few very athletic "gratis invitees" over the years, too, who came into my program and almost immediately started beating up on my best "self-selected" kids who had been in lessons for a while. I still lost those good athletes to football, basketball, baseball, track, etc., if I had a group of these good athletes all together, I possibly could have kept them.

I tried to promote the idea of getting school P.E. teachers in our USTA Florida school tennis program, which I ran in Florida for three years, to suggest especially talented kids - like the 5 and 6 year olds who went flipping across the playground and finished it out with a double back flip with a half twist. I got suggestions from our teachers and hooked these kind of kids up with local tennis pros who I called and got them to volunteer. I only called the best of the best pros to volunteer to work with these kids and I never ever had a pro turn me down. They all loved the idea and were enthusiastic about it. The only folks who poo-pooed my idea was the USTA because they told me I'd never have a pro volunteer! I really wasn't surprised by their response. With their record, who were they to say what would work and what wouldn't.

I left the USTA in 2010 and, after that, I never knew what happened to the program. While I was getting the program going, I did get good feedback from the pros, though. I later heard that somebody else tried my idea, but as far as I know, nothing ever became of it.

I have no data to prove this, but for every single player in the USTA Player Dev program, there's probably many kids who may have been especially chosen by P.E. teachers nationwide - those kids who have proven themselves to be super athletes "flipping down the playground" - who could have easily beat out the "Player Development kid."

I taught high school and coached wrestling early in my career. I was told by my mentor my first year coaching wrestling that making a really good wrestler is just like making really good chicken salad. "Coach, it's hard make to good chicken salad out of chicken s- - -. You'd need to go find some better chickens."

John MacDonald


 

I usually stay just watching and reading from the side lines but I'm a bit concern about how much money is spent in Player's development and I'm assuming the way they are spending money is in a very ignorant way.

Again this is my assumption but probably they spend all the money with National champs or "Elite" junior players that probably already have everything they need.

Have the USTA ever wonder how soccer players for example are developed...? This is just a simple example but soccer teams such as Real Madrid, Manchester United, Barcelona and so on, don't spend all their money training "Junior stars". They spend money of quality scout or recruiters that are experts on finding raw talent and specially kids that have financial limitations because they have the drive and HUNGER to pursuit their dreams because they are passionate about it. They are responsible for their acts and they don't throw tuntrums at their parents or coaches because they lost or because daddy didn't change the over grip in their racket. These are kids that don't have a soccer ball sometimes but they are willing to brake their backs training and pushing their minds, bodies and spirits to the limit.

Why in the world the USTA doesn't have top level Scouts that LOVE THE SPORT of tennis and not money looking for talent in every city and Tennis Academy in the USA. ????

This is a basic move that should be the priority in order to help those kids with what they need. Rackets, strings, coaching, fitness, money to travel and compete in higher levels, etc.

The USTA probably gives $ to the juniors that already have reached high levels. Most of those kids usually have lots of $ and they can compete a lot, go to great tennis academies and they can compete locally, nationally and internationally.

Have the USTA noticed that the top players and the top future Stars in the ATP or WTA representing the country of USA are from African American descendants...?

The best woman player in HISTORY is Serena.

The list:
Serena and Venus Williams
Francés Tiafoe
Coco Gauff

Is this coincidence ?
Have these players come from wealthy Anglo families ???

Is anyone thinking inside the USTA?
Have they noticed this?
Have they noticed that players that FIGHT are players that come generally speaking from struggle and know how to hassle because they had to fight since they were little..?

How in the world the USTA is babying these wealthy junior champions instead of helping kids that have real hunger to become a better person and athlete because they are passionate and know the meaning of NOT HAVING everything?

Has the USTA noticed that countries like the Czech Republic, Croatia, Serbia, France and so on who are not even the size of 1/10 of Texas are creating high performance tennis players like pop corn even tho they are very limited financially and in terms of structure and facilities in comparison with the USA..?

Has the USTA join those Federations to see what in the world they are doing different than them?

If they take 1 week to do their work, they will find out that in those countries the sport is not Maximize as a business starting from Federation Coaches, Local Academies etc. They don't have the black hand of Private classes trying to squeeze all the juice out of the player until the parents have no more money. Those coaches are humble people that love the sport and give structure, discipline and direction to the kids whether they like it or not.

They are not trying to keep the players happy and their parents so they can keep coming back to take more privates and spend lots of $.

They tell the kids when they are being lazy or when they are complaining or not fighting. They tell them. They tell their parents if their kids are not giving their best and the parents don't attack the coach or defend the kid with excuses.

Here coaches or even USTA high level executives are afraid of telling the truth because of fear of affecting the kid or the business or their name, etc etc etc.

How in the world will they produce fighters and champions ??

How sad.

Jose Antonio Casares-Falconi


 

My answer to your questions about the USTA Player Development program is that they are probably doing the best they can by offering programs for the many players from around the country. Not one organization has the "Secret Sauce or Magic Pill" that can create and develop major champions. I fully support any initiative to better sponsor local programs. Once the majors are off the TV network, then it's the local community of pros, volunteers and families to continue the day-to-day promotion of our sport.

If the USTA would share the wealth throughout the National sections and local districts, then that "diamond in the rough" just might come to the forefront. They're future prospects and potentials champions out there…we all need to nurture that somebody. Hopefully, USTA will step up their game and ante up in whatever way they can. If we can all contribute to players to become contenders or champions than Mission Accomplished by being the best they can be…

Leo Estopare


 

Here is an interview I did with Rick Limpert that ran during the US Open. I go into detail about my thoughts on Player Development for part of it. https://techofsports.blubrry.net/joshua-jacobs-ceo-founder-of-tga-premier-sports/

Joshua Jacobs


 

1. Thumbs up and down this is complex questions we need to attract better athletes to tennis !
2. Again maybe cut in half or wait another 3-5 years and see if the center in Orlando starts producing!
3. We definitely need more more for grass root programs so maybe half is the answer

My question to you why is tennis the 8-10 most popular sport in America how do we change that?

Dan MacDonald


 

My daughter has benefitted from USTA Player Development so I am biased.

However, I think that USTA should invest in player development. You need to compare what the USTA spends to other tennis associations and what the output is. The women -- upcoming are doing well. Anisimova, McNally, Gauff ... And there are a great number of WTA players in the Top 100.
On the men's side it is not great. I see that other countries are better at attracting their top athletes to tennis and are investing far more in them.

So, I actually think that we need to invest more to get a payout. As others have noted, some should flow back to coaches of the players and their teams.

Again, I think to make an assessment, you should compare spending on player development per capita, and then look at the results.

Mike Beck


 

I don't think that the usta should continue spending 400 million dollars annually without spending some of that money helping individual teaching professionals who are trying to keep their local programs going by supporting their grassroot programs financially.
I also think that the usta should look at more financial support to senior tennis. Our seniors play and travel throughout the country and the best play in the ITF world championships with only minimal support from the usta.

Pete Kelly


 

I am only really aware of the current program, not the past. I think player development is an important program - it exposes pro tennis to numerous communities and does provide the avenues for experience necessary to be successful. I would like to see the actual detail of such expenditure ( the $25mm) as each pro circuit host does not receive enough to really support the real costs.
It would be a huge mistake to drop player development! I am opposed to that!

Ralph Goehring


 

I believe money should be spent in grassroots tennis. I think we should start by replacing hard courts in our public parks with clay courts. There is not a better way to learn the fundamentals of tennis than on clay. It takes away the power game, serves, but allows players to move more freely on the court. It allows to give you more time and set up the proper way to hit shots.

Richard Wimsatt


 

A short while ago I attended the USTA's Player development High-Performance Coaching program, a one-week event in Carson, California. In order to qualify for the $75 event you have to list all your accomplishments, including players you coached to College, etc.

On the plus side, I was able to meet with and learn from José Higueras and his PD staff. That was great and informative. Lots of materials were supplied. The atmosphere, networking, and building relationships with others across the country were super. It was interesting to hear that Higueras believes tennis academies don't work. He said, "…they're wasting family money, often with coaches that aren't even qualified." He thinks what works is private, individual coaching by qualified professionals.

On the other hand, I found it questionable that half of the participants were interns with zero teaching experience. Those were mostly young players straight out of high school or college who were able to hit the crap out of a ball, but that was it. No other experience. Great hitting partners but how would they be qualified to go straight out of school into being involved in a High-Performance program? None of them were USPTA or PTR certified.

Also, all along the walls were photos of successful American players, from Madison keys to John Isner and Sam Querrey. When asked whether any of those many players came from USTA Player Development, the answer was NONE. They all came from private coaches.

As to your questions:

Q1: Thumbs Up. However, there are some loopholes. They were not teaching us anything we DON'T know. They were teaching us stuff we DID already know.
Q2: Out the money to better use. Help the professionals grow the game.
Q3: Yes, squash it and send the money to private coaches. USTA PD should cater to private coaches.

Anonymous


 

1. I give the USTA PD a Huge Thumbs Down!
2. There is no possible reason to continue. The US Open commercial with Madison Keys showing off her new multi million $ house next to the USTA Campus so she can free help with her game was totally appalling!
3. I totally agree! The USTA should put more effort into helping grow the game, which they have failed at tremendously. Instead of wasting money on players who have demonstrated they don't have what it takes, find young players who need the help instead of the upper class losers. The USTA should absolutely put an end to so many highly over paid chiefs traveling the world at a truly great, great waste of money, The USTA should put an end to the effort to create a monopoly with the USPTA that violates most Anti-Trust Laws and work as hard to grow tennis as the French Ferderation de Tennis and Tennis Australia have. It's amazes me how we have hundfreds of more citizens than both combined, but we fall very, very short in the growth of tennis. I find it appauling that the USTA National Campus has so many hard courts ( for leagues) and so little clay courts "The Surface of Champions".

Stan K. Gray


 

I am hesitant to comment Rich. However, I have mixed feelings. I do think that if there's a way to fund local coaches around the country they should have a pilot program and give it a try.
Having said that , it seems like they have been making strides with all the upcoming young women.
I've always felt it was a top down organization, much like the federal government.

Anonymous


 

1. USTA Player Development: Thumbs Down

2. I do think the USTA needs to re-evaluate expenditures on player development. Too much of their money goes to administrative salaries
and they are overstaffed. More money to the junior players and less to salaries. There is also a need to bring new voices into the process.

3. I do not think PD needs to be discontinued immediately, but major reforms need to be made. Put more into grassroots.

Question: Why does it cost $ 150. or more to enter one National Junior Tournament? Even sectional junior tournaments cost $ 50. or more.

Anonymous


 

Thumbs down! #2..No..#3 Yes I agree, discontinue immediately.

Lenny Scheuermann

 

 

US Open 2019

 

My God, what a match!! As a rabid Nadal fan I was running out of fingernails to bite! Rafa won this one over Medvedev at 6-4 in the fifth, in close to five hours of excruciating tennis. Rafa was up two breaks in the fifth, but with the tank moving towards empty, he was having great trouble finishing. He dropped serve at 5-2; had a match point at 3-5 with a second serve on his forehand (with Medvedev at midcourt), choked and missed it; and if he had lost his last service game at 5-4 (and he was down a break point and tight) I would have bet on Medvedev for the match.

It was a scary match for Nadal fans from the beginning. Rafa just looked nervous. He was reluctant to take risks and hit near the lines. This was particularly evident by the absence of his flat, sharp, penetrating backhand crosscourt and his trademark forehand down the line. Instead, he seemed content to hook his forehand crosscourt (too often short) as well as slice his backhand, usually up the line, or hit it flat one side or the other, but not near the lines.

As a consequence, Medvedev generally had control of the points. Luckily for Rafa, Medvedev didn’t figure out how to finish the points for two and a half sets. He wasn’t coming to net, nor was he able to consistently hit winners off the ground. On the other hand, Rafa’s only reliable offense seemed to be his net attacks, which he used whenever he got a chance to take control off the ground and with the occasional serve and volley. And during this time Rafa’s strategy worked just well enough for him to get up two sets and a break in the third. But he never looked comfortable nor did his lead ever look safe.

In a nick of time, Medvedev figured out that just controlling the points wasn’t good enough. He would need to come forward to finish points, with either a volley or a winning groundstroke, and he did. In the meantime, he was moving easily and beautifully, not missing, and serving with great accuracy and effect. This enabled him to tie the match at two sets all and led to the heart-stopping finish in the fifth set.

To be honest, I don’t remember exactly how Nadal got his two service breaks in the fifth, but I do recall it was rather fluky and not at all in his usual comfortable, Nadal manner. Nadal was tiring and Medvedev looked about the same as he did in the first set. Nadal got across the finish line by a whisker, and if I were Nadal, I would never want to play Medvedev again.


Bizarre ending to the U.S. Open women’s final, where Bianca Andrescu defeated Serena Williams in two nerve-riddled, shaky sets. I don’t know what match Chris Evert was watching when she said Serena played well but that Bianca just played a little bit better. I thought Serena played an awful match (for her).

Bianca is a tough little nut - hard hitting and hard to scare. But Serena was far from the same player who had literally destroyed Svitolina in the semi-final. Serena was obviously afraid of Bianca, and when she is afraid of an opponent, her game suffers dramatically. Serena is at her best when she is playing someone who can’t hurt her (like Svitolina). Unfortunately for Serena, Bianca is a player who not only could hurt her, but who was not at all afraid to do so, and Serena knew it.

Andrescu won a close first set 6-3, with a break of serve that was helped by a Williams double-fault when down break point. There were a number of excellent points played in it, but it was clear from the beginning that Andrescu had the power and nerves to stand up the the best Williams could throw at her. And when Andrescu had the opportunity, she had the powerful groundstrokes to hit through Serena at any time. It was clear that she got Serena’s attention, and not in a good way for Serena.

As the second set started, I was curious to see if Bianca would take her foot off the gas or get conservative, which is so common when a player is up a set in a tense and important match. It immediately became clear that Andrescu was going to to neither, as she came out firing, holding serve and breaking Serena. After a one game lapse, Bianca ran to a 5-1 lead, again helped by Serena, who missed most of her first serves and every other ball with her groundstrokes.

Then Bianca got shaky, opened the door for Serena, and Serena began to play a bit better. In a hurry two service breaks went away for Bianca, and it was 5-all. To her credit, Bianca steadied down on her serve at this crucial stage; Serena began to think (and worry) again; Bianca held; and Serena, with an AWOL first serve, promptly lost her serve and the match.

In summary, Serena played poorly when she got frightened by an opponent who was not overawed by her formidable game and championship trophies and who had a few impressive weapons of her own. At the same time, Bianca is admirable for being able to stand up to the magnitude of the situation and for not panicking when her great opponent came back from a 1-5 deficit to even the score.

Allen Fox


 

The US open tennis 2019 was amazing in general I like so much all the matches and the final was excelent , Rafa like to defeat Daniil and Daniil not like to lost the match.

Was excelent not only for the match, because a younger player find a place at the final of the tournament, the same history was at the women final Serena is a legend and fight too to won the match.

My opinion is US tennis federation is working very good with the women tennis

Alex Heavey


 

I loved the Woman's Final. I loved the Federer vs Dimitrov contest, but was sorry Roger lost. The Player Development in the US is terrible and should go back to the regions, decentralize. The Grand Slams should change to 3 sets instead of Five. The Slams are too taxing on the players

Dale Jensen


 

What a final yesterday.

Both players fighting every point reaching the highest level physical and mental .Different styles : Medvedev with a powerful forehand
And huge stroke variety with his backhand and emphasising down the line not letting Nadal use his forehand, tactically perfect, mentally rocky ,no emotions at all, very aggressive on his game and very solid on his transition at the net.

At the other end ,the Spanish gladiator ,powerful with his spin and high balls sent from his massive forehand...It worked until Medvedev decided to step backwards on

Making the battlefield deeper on giving himself more space to prepare his shots and increase the pace on them : spot on, then the russian moved Rafa and dictate most of the points.Until the 5th set.
The mastery of Rafa was not to spend all energy trying to stop the great game display

By the Russian during the 3rd and the4th set ,and the tactic worked perfectly for the Spaniard .Nadal knew that Medvedev will drop the level, at some point, and he did....Medvedev serve was weaker on the fifth ,massive drop ,Nadal noticed and used his reserves of energy to be stronger on his ground strokes than the Russian: Lack of experience from the Young player who still resisted until the end of the set, when he surrounded under the physical power and perfect tactics displayed by Nadal.
That is why Rafa is a great champion: he reinvents himself with a new formula according to the player profile He has to play....Giant Rafa.

Forever!

Jaime Sabate


 

What a men's final yesterday at the Open.

Imagine the popularity of the game if the USA developed a men's champion. If fans can cheer on a Spaniard, and give a Russian a standing ovation for his never-give-in attitude in a match, then our sport would be off the charts among kids and families.

Leo Estopare


 

All I have to say is that it would be nice if some of the announcers (I.E. Chris Evert) gave some credit to players other than Serena. What Serena has done is quite amazing but I'll be darned if there aren't some other players out there too. And, shhhh, some have even beaten Serena- in the Grand Slams.
Give some well deserved credit when it's due and stop tiptoeing around it. Bianca played extremely well and Serena gave nothing away. So bite your lip and deal with that Chris Evert and the USTA. Believe it or not, tennis doesn't revolve around Serena Williams- as much as some announcers and the USTA would like you to think.

Paul Marcum


 

I thought this interesting, as I noticed in our Café that there were a lot of people there to see this match. What I also thought was interesting was that most of them were there in hopes of seeing Serena tie the all-time slam record and/or cheer on an American player. Both finals were epic, but I also think that the post-match interview with Osaka and Coco won over a great deal of viewers. When any competitors compete in any sport, they naturally develop an appreciation for each other, especially true in tennis, the only sport that has both the winner and finalist as part of the closing ceremony…kudos to us tennis enthusiast and players.

The upset by Canadian teenager Bianca Andreescu over superstar Serena Williams at the US Open Women's tennis tournament propelled the network to a 2.7 overnight rating for its three-hour telecast. That's ESPN's best for the event and up 13% from a 2.4 year ago, the previous high.

The two-hour match portion, which saw Andreescu triumph 6-3, 7-5, earned a 3.0, and the rating peaked at a 3.9 rating from 5:45-6:00 p.m. ET, during the closing moments of the second set.

The 2.7 is tied for ESPN's highest all-time US Open rating with a telecast of quarterfinal action September 8, 2015, the first year ESPN had exclusivity and aired the entire tournament. That evening's matches included Serena Williams playing Venus Williams.

For the tournament to date, ESPN is averaging a 1.0 overnight rating across ESPN and ESPN2, up 25% from a 0.8 at this point a year ago.

Rod Heckelman


 

That was one of the best battles of The US Open 2019 that I've seen in along time. Both physical and mental toughness were at their peak. The comebacks and the staying power of both players were unprecedented in this year's game of tennis. There is a lot to be learned from this match.

Tom Brennan

 

Middle East Work

Headlined "Teaching Tennis in the Middle East" we had asked our readers these questions:

We have heard good and bad stories about promises from Middle East tennis organizations and clubs and the working conditions in some cases. We'd like to get to the bottom of it.

If you had been employed in the Middle East, or still work there teaching tennis, please share your experience with us. Positive and negative. Were promises kept? Were you paid on time? How were you treated? How was housing? Did you have experiences you want to share?


 

Hello, my name is Borislav Bolic and I am tennis coach almost 40 years. I have been coaching in many countries and I have been on tour with many juniors in Europe USA and South America.

I was head coach in Egypt in one of the biggest tennis academies in Cairo, I had one assistant coach, four supervisors and about 20 coaches. I worked there three years and I have great experience working in SMASH Tennis Academy, everyone from the owner, Amr El Sallaly , to the ball boys were trying to help me to give my best as a coach and the person. My salary was never late, all the things I needed for my work was on time on the court , everything was perfect. Wonderful people and beautiful country.

After Egypt I worked for Saudi Arabia national team like head coach in Davis Cup in Doha and we went before that on some futures in Dubai and Abu Dabi, also fantastic experience and from first day everything was organized excellent, also everything from contract was done.

And my last experience was in Beirut in Lebanon where I was about three months because my friend who was head coach there, invited me for summer camp to help him to organize that camp because I am more experienced then he was at that time. We did very good job, we had more then two hundred players and everything was excellent, also I must say that everything from contract was respected and the people from the club were nice and helpful all the time.

I hope that I gave you some important informations and it will help you to make some picture about Middle East, also I must tell you that I am from Serbia.

Borislav Bolic


 

I had very bad story from Dubai. I spent there 8 months but I have been paid only 4 times. It was not only me but also other coaches. In 3 years almost 10 coaches from all around the world.

The name of the owner is Matt Inglish and the name of the academy is Advantage Sports UAE. This guy was a PTR Pro and we also reported him to the PTR.

We took him to court and he was supposed to pay us the rest of the money but it took almost 2 years.

Lucia Obysovska